FIRSTLY THE GOOD NEWS…
There has been one
item of good news in recent weeks. At the plenary session of the European
Parliament in May, MEPs voted to cap ‘roaming charges’ for making and receiving
mobile calls across the EU.
As
readers who travel to Europe on holiday or business discover to their surprise
on their return home, mobile phone calls made and received whilst abroad are
subject to a massive surcharge. It’s bad enough to pay extra when making a call
from France or Belgium but it is really galling to receive a call from someone
in the UK – who hasn’t a clue where you are – and then be landed with a bill
simply for talking to them. It affects everybody but we MEPs are more than
aware of the problem with journalists ringing up for comments and views all the
time.
So at
long last, the European Commission and the European Parliament have decided to
take on the mobile phone companies and although I am a convinced eurosceptic,
even I can see that the problem can only be solved on a Europe-wide basis; the
power of national governments to do anything about it is obviously limited.
I am
delighted about this move. It means that innocent customers going on holiday to
Europe will no longer receive a nasty surprise in their mobile phone bills on
their return. Another welcome change is the requirement for mobile phone
operators to send customers a text message warning them of the additional,
albeit reduced, charges when using their mobiles abroad. So at least you will
be warned.
The only
snag with the news is that the changes won’t be in force for this year’s summer
holidays – but at least they are on their way.
AND NOW THE BAD …
Put a note in your
diaries for June 22nd. That’s the date Prime Minister Tony Blair
goes to his last European summit and if the rumours prove true, will sign up to
a new European Constitution. Of course, he and the other European leaders won’t
call it a constitution. Perish the thought. It will be described as a sensible
and minor tidying up exercise – simply making the European Union work more
efficiently.
But of course,
this will be very far from the truth. Since the peoples of France and Holland
wisely rejected the proposed constitution last year, thus killing plans to
increase the powers of Brussels stone dead, European leaders have been wracking
their brains to find ways to get round the problem without bothering the voters
in further referendums. The wheeze promoted by Angela Merkel, Chancellor of
Germany, is to cherry pick parts of the original constitution proposals and
argue that these can be implemented without asking the people of Europe to
approve them. This is particularly relevant to us in Britain because Tony Blair
promised the British people a referendum if the constitution ever went ahead.
Readers should be
aware that the warning bells have begun to ring. A fresh onslaught on British
sovereignty is underway and Tony Blair’s final act as Prime Minister could be to
approve measures which will weaken our country’s ability both to say no to
further European legislation and also for the appointment of a European foreign
minister to speak for us in the international arena. And all without our having
the right, as we were promised, to say no.
Years ago when
Margaret Thatcher rightly abolished the Greater London Council without a vote
from those affected by the abolition, Ken Livingstone campaigned for a
referendum on the issue with the slogan ‘Say no to no say’. Even though I am
not a fan of Red Ken, I cannot think of a better line with which to campaign
against Tony Blair’s last broken promise.